| |
Globalising Art, Architecture and
Design History?Debating Approaches to Curriculum Change in the
UK
|
Friday 19 September 2003 |
|
London House, Goodenough College, Mecklenburgh
Square, London WC1 |
Abstracts
KEYNOTE
To see ourselves as others see us can be eye-opening. To see
others as sharing nature with ourselves is the merest decency. But it is from
the far more difficult achievement of seeing ourselves amongst others, as a
local example of the forms human life has locally taken, a case among cases, a
world among worlds, that the largeness of mind, without which objectivity is
self-congratulation and tolerance a sham, comes. If art history has any general
office in the world it is to keep re-teaching this fugitive truth.
SESSION A: Different Art Histories
Panel 1
Nearly twenty years ago Jan Vansina remarked it was then
impossible to write an art history of Africa, "as too many scholars in the
field of 'African art' have been allergic to historical pursuits." In this
ahistorical state 'the art of a continent' has been used to bolster colonial,
post-colonial and eurocentric agendas. Despite developments in Art History
during the last two decades, the concept of African art remains as entrenched
now in the wider disciplinary culture of Art History as it ever was. Disrupting
that concept does not simply involve more sensitive research, for this has now
been done in some areas, but also confronting histories of European engagements
with the continent and its material cultures (cf. Annie Coombes, Reinventing
Africa). Similarly, any attempt to incorporate art from Africa into an
undergraduate art history curriculum in the West should foreground social,
political and historical aspects of the West's encounters with those objects
and images; not only issues of iconography and symbolism - which so easily act
to define the Other. In this presentation I discuss how this might be achieved
using two very different traditions of image making, also with two very
different historical trajectories in the West. The first, the art of Benin,
that art that came to define 'African art'; and second San (Bushman) rock art,
that art always excluded from 'African art'.
How might a smallish School of Art begin to globalise,
without a radical revision of recently validated courses? One pragmatic answer
is to follow the example of Evelyn Welch (University of Sussex), who has
inserted a week's teaching on Benin bronzes into an Italian Renaissance module.
We have nominated six modules for this treatment, three of which have now been
modified. To Objects in Space, a first-level module on the western figure,
topics on Egyptian and West African figures have been added. Next year we shall
insert the Mayan figure. To the compulsory second-level module, Visual
Theories, an obligatory essay question has been set on the applicability of
Western analytical methods to non-Western artefacts. The contextual range of
the third-level module, King's College Chapel, has been extended to embrace the
Islamic madrasa. This piecemeal approach to curriculum modification enables a
team to innovate quickly, extend the curriculum easily and set up striking
juxtapositions. With modest resources, students can be redirected, challenged
and enthused. However, the method is open to two complaints: that it formalises
the disparity of weighting between western and non-western topics and that it
sets in high relief the otherness of the inserted culture.
Panel 2
This project was built on the Edinburgh department's
existing strengths in non-western art, but instead of adding a new
specialisation, it aimed at changing perceptions of existing material by
offering new perspectives. Specifically, it aimed to reinvigorate the teaching
of Modernism in the arts by removing it from the exclusive orbit of Europe and
the United States. The experience of architecture and public art in Latin
America, particularly Brazil and Mexico since the 1930s seemed to offer
alternatives. What the project hoped to achieve specifically were
understandings of modernisms that (1) challenged the puritanical ideologies
often seen in Europe and the US; (2) were often anti-European; (3) made an
appeal to the pre-colonial past; (4) were local rather than international in
appeal. The session explores these questions, and potential problems and issues
that they may raise in teaching. The project's material output, in the form of
slides and a CD-Rom, will be explored for their pedagogic value.
SESSION B: Strategic Collaborations
Panel 3
The project was envisaged from the outset as a way of
capitalising on the high quality resources available in Devon relevant to the
GLAADH initiative. The Royal Albert Memorial Museum in Exeter, established in
the 1860s, possesses an internationally significant collection of artefacts
from the Pacific, Africa and North America. Exhibited as 'World Cultures', this
resource gave the Royal Albert Memorial Museum designated status. Although the
art history provision at the University of Plymouth already contained material
in its curriculum relevant to the GLAADH initiative, it was not until we were
in receipt of GLAADH funding that it was possible to promote this area of
activity comprehensively in collaboration with the Museum. Working in tandem
with the museum's curators, a number of initiatives have been devised to give
our students direct access to the 'World Cultures' collection and its origins,
providing a local focus for explorations of the interaction between Western
culture and the rest of the world. Student responses to these initiatives as
gauged from the deployment of the pilot module, 'Myths of Primitivism', are
extremely positive. Over the three years, students will be offered the chance
to analyse and critique some prevalent Western assumptions about so-called
'non-Western' art, to understand the closures in academic discourse and
museology that structure this territory and to move on to a consideration of
art practices beyond Western norms.
|
The Computer and the Adze: Using
Multimedia Software Applications in the Delivery of a Course Examining Global
Art Objects and Issues for First Year Undergraduates |
|
Jonathan Day, UCE |
In my first year course, I currently exploit slides, video
(via a VHS player and projector), OHPs and objects in my teaching. I was keen
to introduce some of the dynamic possibilities of computers into my delivery -
animated diagrams, images with staged information reveal, and the like,
alongside the incorporation of the materials currently exploited through more
traditional means. Students are ever more demanding in terms of delivery,
thanks to the incredible pace of development in visual media. I am committed to
remaining somewhere near to the leading edge of this wave in my presentation of
World art, because I believe it is important in countering possible perceptions
of the materials considered as 'old-fashioned', 'quaint', or any other cipher
for 'irrelevant'. I am by no means a technophile; I see the computer as no more
nor less creatively important than the Irian Jaian carving adze on my studio
wall and it has yet to prove itself as having anywhere near the significance of
the book. The content of a lecture is the key to value, and this is not the
victim of technology. Facilitating most fully the experience of the content for
students from a variety of backgrounds with a variety of pre-conceptions is the
challenge which delivery can meet. GLAADH has facilitated an attempt to
introduce multimedia into my teaching, in a budget manner. This session will
examine the successes and failures I have experienced during this attempt. (A
second part of this project was developed by Mike Harrison, Deputy Head, School
of Theoretical and Historical Studies, UCE.)
Panel 4
Jeremy Howard and Brian Aitken (the Humanities Advance
Technology Information Institute), will talk about the creation of the 'Other
Europes' web teaching resource by staff members from the Universities of St
Andrews (Jeremy Howard), Glasgow (Paul Stirton and Juliet Kinchin) and Aberdeen
(Shona Kallestrup). This is an image and text database that allows students to
see material unavailable elsewhere and that their tutor alone would not have
been able to provide. It also allows them to write essays around the material
and deliver these electronically. The material is from the members' own
collections and relates to visual cultures under-represented in the critical
mass of British art history. At present it mainly covers architecture and
design in, or connected to, central and eastern Europe from around 1840 to
1940.
KEYNOTE
What is the state of play surrounding 'diversity' in the
arts and education today? Offering reflections on the cultural context of
curricula change in the UK, and gathering observations from brief comparisons
to the US and Western Europe, this paper attempts to pinpoint some of the
problems and possibilities associated with questions of cultural difference in
the field of art historical enquiry.
SESSION C: Shifting Paradigms
Panel 5
This paper will critically reflect upon the key strategies
employed at Kingston to integrate issues of cultural diversity and difference
across the undergraduate curriculum. Adopting a team approach, the staff team
has put in place key questions and issues, and developed supporting case
studies within a relatively short time span. Particular emphasise will be
placed on the major questions raised and the diverse approaches used to offer
ways of both critiquing and opening up debates by extending the material in
accordance with individual staff interests. This will include consideration of
the creative use of existing local resources such as Kingston Museum and the
Local History Research Centre, Dorich House and the Stanley Picker Gallery for
the Arts alongside the rich resources of nearby London.
Members of staff from the Department of History of Art and
Material Culture (HAMC) and PRASADA, the centre for South Asian arts, within
the Faculty of Art and Design at De Montfort University have, with the support
of the GLAADH project, undertaken to introduce a global dimension to the
curricula of history of art, and fine art and design students. This has
involved two elements: the introduction of case studies on South Asian arts and
crafts into two existing undergraduate modules, Cultural Identity and
Contemporary Crafts, and the development of a website to support students
taking these modules. The website will initially have a major section devoted
to Gujarati textiles and dress from the collections of Leicester Museum. The
undergraduate curriculum for History of Art and Material Culture is being
thoroughly revised for autumn 2004. Whilst maintaining its existing focus on
the period from 1700 to the present in western Europe and north America, this
change is providing an opportunity to integrate the study of world arts
throughout the new curriculum. Two year 1 modules, 'Theories and Practices',
and 'Introduction to Architecture and Design', will introduce sections on
Islamic and South Asian art and material culture. Further modules in years 2
and 3 will similarly introduce a 'global' dimension to all undergraduate
teaching. The project was developed by Dr. Richard Fynes.
Panel 6
The approach of the Sheffield group was to draw upon subject
group strengths in the institutional framework for art and design, taught at
undergraduate and postgraduate level, and begin to address issues of 'non
western' visual culture through institutional representation and cultural
policy. The module title is intended to foreground the transient and dynamic
nature of visual culture, to avoid suggestions of essentialism, and to
problematise notions of cultural identity that posit this through difference.
Key texts from a range of disciplines are used as the basis of lectures and
seminar discussions whilst the case studies provide a focus for analysis. The
initial case study of the Inuit collection provided an example of the role of
agency, this we have now developed to include subsequent government
intervention in Inuit visual culture and other indigenous, fourth world
cultures. In the next academic year the number of regions for the case studies
will be increased. Although the regional focus has clear strengths we are also
aware of the dangers of this approach. The extended number of case studies
should provide evidence of a variety of examples of transculturation, and
attendant issues of acculturation, complicity etc., but we will also make more
extended reference to post colonial discourses as a means of drawing out beyond
the regional.
In response to a perceived lack of coverage of non-Western
cinemas on the MA History of Film and Visual Media at Birkbeck, an option on
Perspectives in World Cinema was launched in 2002, with the aim of engaging the
rich diversity of these other filmmaking traditions. Taught by Professors Laura
Mulvey and Lucia Nagib, and designed to run alongside a related programme of
talks by invited speakers, the module has demonstrably broadened the scope of
subject areas to embrace Brazilian, Iranian, and Far Eastern cinemas.
Importantly, the framework affords flexibility, and the continual possibility
of shifts in content. The formerly small film collection of non-Western films
within a larger collection, overwhelmingly Western in bias, has now been
substantially enlarged.
Back to top
|