KINGSTON UNIVERSITY

SCHOOL OF ART & DESIGN HISTORY

BA Art, Architecture and Design History, April 2003

 

 

HA 1198: Exploring Contexts              

 

Sample Student Work

 

How far does the Museum of London reflect the cultural diversity of London's population, past and present?

 

'I see nothing that affects my identity here, I see an authorized version of the story of London' - Jack Lohman, Director of the Museum of London’[1]


London has the most diverse population in the United Kingdom: a recent report estimates that residents speak up to 300 different languages and follow at least 14 different religions whilst the city itself is home to both the richest and some of the poorest households in the country.[2]  The new director of the Museum of London, Jack Lohman, claims he wants 'to make a museum that is relaxed about being multicultural' one that brings diversity to the fore.  After nearly a year in post, and currently mid-way through the first phase of a £333 million, five-year redevelopment programme, he faces strong criticism.

 

In this essay I shall examine the way the Museum of London, with particular reference to the World City gallery, reflects and represents the cultural diversity of London's present population and that of its history.  I shall consider not only the permanent exhibits within the museum but also the special events and workshops offered to the public and the information available to its on-line visitors.

 

The World City gallery, the first to be covered by the present redevelopment programme, spans the capital's history from 1789 to the outbreak of World War One in 1914, during which time London was at the centre of the world in terms of power and wealth - the capital of a huge British Empire and pre-eminent capital of the world.  The museum audio-guide informs 'there were more Scotchmen (in London) than in Edinburgh, more Irish than in Dublin, more Jews than in Palestine and more Roman Catholics than in Rome.' The other (historically earlier) galleries make little reference to this cultural mix.  A small panel in the Tudor gallery refers to the beginnings of the slave trade, crown patronage of European craftsmen and the refuge sought in London, after Henry VIII's split with the Catholic church, by those suffering religious persecution abroad.  A similar panel in the Stuart gallery tells of the increasing fashion of owning African or Asian slaves, that Cromwell allowed Jews to re-settle in London and Charles II encouraged merchants from Holland to live and work in the city.  It is not until the Eighteenth Century gallery that an exhibit refers to a personal story.  Tucked away under the heading 'politics and literature' the small volume of letters from Ignatius Sancho, the child slave brought from the West Indies who became a butler before opening his own grocery store on Westminster Bridge.  Little information is given in the display with the book, but the Museum of London's website proves informative with extracts from his letters home, portraits of Ignatius Sancho, a biography and his musical scores. The same site also provides information on other slaves - biographies, travel maps, essays on the slave trade and links to related websites.[3]    

In the World City gallery reference to the immigrant community (during the period over one third of the population of London had not been born in the capital) presents a depressing story.  The Irish, the largest immigrant group, fled from poverty only to live in the poorest, unhealthiest properties; the poor black immigrants came to the city with the promise of work but examples then quote road sweepers, dishwashers and beggars.  Under the heading 'Philanthropy - voices from the past' an exhibit relays stories from residents of the East End Rothschild Buildings, Jews who fled to London escaping persecution in Russia and Eastern Europe under the British 'open door policy' yet still to face intolerance when reaching London.

 

There are however a few success stories, though these are sometimes difficult to find amid the larger (perhaps rightly so) displays on the Great Exhibition of 1851, the suffragettes, costumes, education and disease.  An exhibit on Mary Seacole the Jamaican nurse who, when her application to join Florence Nightingale's band of nurses was rejected, travelled to the Crimea at her own expense to tend the British troops and on Imre Kiralfy, the Hungarian Emigré of Jewish descent who staged theatrical shows and rebuilt the Earls Court and White City exhibition grounds.  In a 'listen to the past' panel - located in a dark corner of the gallery - extracts from speeches by the first Indian Member of Parliament to represent a London constituency and from the first person of African descent to address the House of Commons.  In the large display on 'Entertainment', the Victorian theatres and music halls, the names of prominent performers give clues to their ancestry - Chevalier, Gounod, Delivine, Bernhardt and the black Samuel Taylor-Coleridge.  In the Victorian Walk too the shops display tea and coffee, tobacco from the West Indies, European glassware and a barrel organ from Italy, but again it is through the internet and not the displays themselves or even the children's work sheets, that details on where these commodities came from or how they reached London, are available.   

If it is Jack Lohman's aim to bring 'diversity to the fore' (he himself is the son of two Polish emigrés to Britain), at this stage of his redevelopment programme I can only agree with a recent statement by Stephen Douglass, head of culture and heritage at Southwark Council. 'I don't think the Museum of London has made enough effort to address diverse communities...it claims to represent and reflect London as a whole but it doesn't.'[4]

 

There are over 200 registered museums and galleries in London at present covering not only the needs of local communities but also such diverse topics as, for example, dental collections, Jewish art, textiles and medicinal herbs.[5]  A study in 1998 by the Museums and Galleries Commission set out to discover the perceptions of museums held by British ethnic communities.  Their main finding was common across all ethnic groups.  Museums were perceived as 'quiet, reverential and unwelcoming to children' places for intellectuals; elitist and difficult - 'White people's territory.'[6] It was thought exhibits were constructed from a white perspective with little acknowledgement made to the achievements or experiences of minority populations.  There was however general agreement that society needed museums, that even if people did not visit them they felt reassured by their existence.   


It is perhaps through the programme of special events and workshops that the Museum of London is best trying to dispel these prejudices and embrace the cultural diversity of the capital.  In May 2003 as part of Museums and Galleries Month it presents a series of talks, workshops and events based on 'Cultures: Then and Now'.  Discussion will take place on outstanding black individuals of the 19th century and the immigrant population of London from Roman times onwards.  A Jamaican writer presents a workshop on tracing family history whilst costumed guides tell stories for children of famous black Londoners, of spice sellers and traders from the West Indies. Music and folk cultures that have made their way into London from all corners of the world will be performed and in the museum's 'gallery drama' presentations actors portraying Mary Seacole and Olaudah Equiano, an 18th century African who as a writer fought against the slave trade, will tell their stories.    

 

This is admirable, and hopefully such events will continue beyond the designated month.  In an article entitled The Other Side of the Story two members of the Victoria and Albert Museum recently discussed whether Black History Month (an event taking place in the UK every October) was a token gesture or whether it had an important part to play in the celebration of black culture and history.[7] Their arguments could also be used for and against the case for these special events during the 'Cultures: Then and Now' month at the Museum of London.

 

Steve Martin contends 'the idea of having a specific month...only serves to re-enforce notions of black dysfunctionality and otherness.  Black history is part of local, national and global history and should be treated as such...it would be cheaper and more effective to finance programmes aimed at the long-term inclusion of material from non-white and minority communities.'  Eithne Nightingale concludes that museums need to change, to re-invent themselves if they are to survive and that changes must incorporate all aspects of the museum 'diversity in governance, diversity in staffing, different marketing approaches.'[8]

My latest visit to the Museum of London was during the Easter school holidays.  There were few visitors and I was certainly not aware of the multicultural nature of London's present population either from the other visitors or from the staff on duty at the museum.  Audio guides, information leaflets and children's work sheets were only available in English - the museum's guide-book was however also available in French, Spanish and German.

 

No doubt during term time local schools and communities use the museum to a greater extent; certainly many of the special events and workshops are already over-subscribed.  It will be interesting to see how the redevelopment scheme progresses during the next four years and whether, at the end of it, Mr. Lohman achieves his aim of presenting a multicultural museum.  He still has a long way to go. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Hooper-Greenhill, Eileen (ed.), The Educational Role of the Museum, Routledge: London & New York 1999 (2nd edition)

Hudson, Kenneth, Museums of Influence, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1987

 

Journals / Leaflets

Museums Journal, Museums Association, London, October 2002 edition

Museum of London - Exhibitions and Events, Museum of London Publication, 2003
Museum of London - World City Children's Activity Sheets, Museum of London Publications, 2001

Museum Practice, Issue 19, Museums Association Publication, London, 2002

 

Internet Sources 

www.museumassociation.org/pub3.html

www.museumoflondon.org.uk

 



[1] Jack’s London, Museums Journal, October 2002 edition, Museums Association Publication London, 2002, p.18.

[2] Figure from the Greater London Authority, cited by Jane Morris, in Capital Punishment, Museums Journal, ibid, p.20.

 

 

[3] See www.museumoflondon.org.uk

[4] Stephen Douglass, representative of a group of London local authority museums.  Cited by Jane Morris, in Capital Punishment, ibid, p.23.

[5] The Croydon Clocktower, opened in 1995, is an example of a successful museum, library and arts centre which places emphasis on the diversity of its inhabitants in a borough where a quarter come from ethnic minorities, providing a strong community and education programme.

 

 

[6] Hooper-Greenhill (ed.), The Educational Role of the Museum,  Routledge, London & New York, 1999 (2nd edition), pp. 7-8.

[7] The Other Side of the Story A discussion between Steve Martin (writer and researcher) and Eithne Nightingale (head of access, social inclusion and community development at the Victoria and Albert Museum), Museum Journal, Museums Association London, October 2002, pp. 16-17.

 

 

[8] Ibid.